
This photo shows the area where the June 1st impressions were found. The impressions are gone and a few other things can be seen which aren't Bigfoot related.
The area to the east of the road was searched to a distance of about 350 yards in. An unusual heel print was observed and photographed and a protected area behind a rock was noticed and recorded.

This impression was noticed in the area and recorded. It's unknown what made the heal print but whatever did has a great deal of weight. This sticks and rocks are typical of this area and don't record print impressions well.

This small area was noticed and recorded behind this large rock. Notice how the sticks and rocks have been moved away in a semicircle to provide shelter. This is away from the prevailing wind and rain. It's unknown who or what did this but there were no impressions on the dirt area.
This area show signs of multi-use but not to the extreme as observed at Pollock Pines. Excessive amounts of human debris weren't observed but evidence of target practice was seen.

This is the remains of a clay target observed in the area and shotgun casings were seen in some places.
The researchers withdrew from the area east of the road when unknown movement was seen in the trees close to the hillside. While preparing to leave the area it was noticed that all noise and animal movement in the immediate vicinity of the meadow and bluff area had ceased. The only sound came from a flock of birds about 1/8th of a mile to the south. This condition has been reported in previous Bigfoot encounters. We departed the area about 6:30 PM.
CONCLUSIONS:
The researchers conclude the Kyburz location is an area of Sasquatch activity. This is based upon the observations and documented evidence collected by the researchers during their visits. The extent of this activity will be subject to furthur research. We'll attempt to determine to if this area is a summer habituation area or a migratory path.
We don't believe at this time this is an area of year round permanent habituation.
LESSONS LEARNED:
The researchers should have casted the impressions and the footprint that were found on the bluff. A limited amount of hydrocal was available for this purpose. The casts would have documented and preserved the evidence better than the photographs do. However, due to the hardness of the soil it's difficult to determine in advance how well the casts may have come out.